演讲稿是我们在演讲中的指南和参考，通过写演讲稿，我们可以不断反思自己的言行，加分文档网小编今天就为您带来了演讲稿的格式范文模板5篇，相信一定会对你有所帮助。

演讲稿的格式范文篇1

thank you, mr. chairman.

mr. chairman, i join my colleague mr. rangel in thanking you for giving the junior members of this committee the glorious opportunity of sharing the pain of this inquiry. mr. chairman, you are a strong man, and it has not been easy but we have tried as best we can to give you as much assistance as possible.

earlier today, we heard the beginning of the preamble to the constitution of the united states: "we, the people." it's a very eloquent beginning. but when that document was completed on the seventeenth of september in 1787, i was not included in that "we, the people." i felt somehow for many years that george washington and alexander hamilton just left me out by mistake. but through the process of amendment, interpretation, and court decision, i have finally been included in "we, the people."

today i am an inquisitor. an hyperbole would not be fictional and would not overstate the solemnness that i feel right now. my faith in the constitution is whole; it is complete; it is total. and i am not going to sit here and be an idle spectator to the diminution, the subversion, the destruction, of the constitution.

"who can so properly be the inquisitors for the nation as the representatives of the nation themselves?" "the subjects of its jurisdiction are those offenses which proceed from the misconduct of public men."¹ and that's what we're talking about. in other words, [the jurisdiction comes] from the abuse or violation of some public trust.

it is wrong, i suggest, it is a misreading of the constitution for any member here to assert that for a member to vote for an article of impeachment means that that member must be convinced that the president should be removed from office. the constitution doesn't say that. the powers relating to impeachment are an essential check in the hands of the body of the legislature against and upon the encroachments of the executive. the division between the two branches of the legislature, the house and the senate, assigning to the one the right to accuse and to the other the right to judge, the framers of this constitution were very astute. they did not make the accusers and the judgers -- and the judges the same person.

we know the nature of impeachment. we've been talking about it awhile now. it is chiefly designed for the president and his high ministers to somehow be called into account. it is designed to "bridle" the executive if he engages in excesses. "it is designed as a method of national inquest into the conduct of public men."² the framers confided in the congress the power if need be, to remove the president in order to strike a delicate balance between a president swollen with power and grown tyrannical, and preservation of the independence of the executive.

the nature of impeachment: a narrowly channeled exception to the separation-of-powers maxim. the federal convention of 1787 said that. it limited impeachment to high crimes and misdemeanors and discounted and opposed the term "maladministration." "it is to be used only for great misdemeanors," so it was said in the north carolina ratification convention. and in the virginia ratification convention: "we do not trust our liberty to a particular branch. we need one branch to check the other."

"no one need be afraid" -- the north carolina ratification convention -- "no one need be afraid that officers who commit oppression will pass with immunity." "prosecutions of impeachments will seldom fail to agitate the passions of the whole community," said hamilton in the federalist papers, number 65. "we divide into parties more or less friendly or inimical to the accused."³ i do not mean political parties in that sense.

the drawing of political lines goes to the motivation behind impeachment; but impeachment must proceed within the confines of the constitutional term "high crime[s] and misdemeanors." of the impeachment process, it was woodrow wilson who said that "nothing short of the grossest offenses against the plain law of the land will suffice to give them speed and effectiveness. indignation so great as to overgrow party interest may secure a conviction; but nothing else can."

common sense would be revolted if we engaged upon this process for petty reasons. congress has a lot to do: appropriations, tax reform, health insurance, campaign finance reform, housing, environmental protection, energy sufficiency, mass transportation. pettiness cannot be allowed to stand in the face of such overwhelming problems. so today we are not being petty. we are trying to be big, because the task we have before us is a big one.

this morning, in a discussion of the evidence, we were told that the evidence which purports to support the allegations of misuse of the cia by the president is thin. we're told that that evidence is insufficient. what that recital of the evidence this morning did not include is what the president did know on june the 23rd, 1972.

the president did know that it was republican money, that it was money from the committee for the re-election of the president, which was found in the possession of one of the burglars arrested on june the 17th. what the president did know on the 23rd of june was the prior activities of e. howard hunt, which included his participation in the break-in of daniel ellsberg's psychiatrist, which included howard hunt's participation in the dita beard itt affair, which included howard hunt's fabrication of cables designed to discredit the kennedy administration.

we were further cautioned today that perhaps these proceedings ought to be delayed because certainly there would be new evidence forthcoming from the president of the united states. there has not even been an obfuscated indication that this committee would receive any additional materials from the president. the committee subpoena is outstanding, and if the president wants to supply that material, the committee sits here. the fact is that on yesterday, the american people waited with great anxiety for eight hours, not knowing whether their president would obey an order of the supreme court of the united states.

at this point, i would like to juxtapose a few of the impeachment criteria with some of the actions the president has engaged in. impeachment criteria: james madison, from the virginia ratification convention. "if the president be connected in any suspicious manner with any person and there be grounds to believe that he will shelter him, he may be impeached."

we have heard time and time again that the evidence reflects the payment to defendants money. the president had knowledge that these funds were being paid and these were funds collected for the 1972 presidential campaign. we know that the president met with mr. henry petersen 27 times to discuss matters related to watergate, and immediately thereafter met with the very persons who were implicated in the information mr. petersen was receiving. the words are: "if the president is connected in any suspicious manner with any person and there be grounds to believe that he will shelter that person, he may be impeached."

justice story: "impeachment" is attended -- "is intended for occasional and extraordinary cases where a superior power acting for the whole people is put into operation to protect their rights and rescue their liberties from violations." we know about the huston plan. we know about the break-in of the psychiatrist's office. we know that there was absolute complete direction on september 3rd when the president indicated that a surreptitious entry had been made in dr. fielding's office, after having met with mr. ehrlichman and mr. young. "protect their rights." "rescue their liberties from violation."

the carolina ratification convention impeachment criteria: those are impeachable "who behave amiss or betray their public trust."4 beginning shortly after the watergate break-in and continuing to the present time, the president has engaged in a series of public statements and actions designed to thwart the lawful investigation by government prosecutors. moreover, the president has made public announcements and assertions bearing on the watergate case, which the evidence will show he knew to be false. these assertions, false assertions, impeachable, those who misbehave. those who "behave amiss or betray the public trust."

james madison again at the constitutional convention: "a president is impeachable if he attempts to subvert the constitution." the constitution charges the president with the task of taking care that the laws be faithfully executed, and yet the president has counseled his aides to commit perjury, willfully disregard the secrecy of grand jury proceedings, conceal surreptitious entry, attempt to compromise a federal judge, while publicly displaying his cooperation with the processes of criminal justice. "a president is impeachable if he attempts to subvert the constitution."

if the impeachment provision in the constitution of the united states will not reach the offenses charged here, then perhaps that 18th-century constitution should be abandoned to a 20th-century paper shredder.

has the president committed offenses, and planned, and directed, and acquiesced in a course of conduct which the constitution will not tolerate? that's the question. we know that. we know the question. we should now forthwith proceed to answer the question. it is reason, and not passion, which must guide our deliberations, guide our debate, and guide our decision.

i yield back the balance of my time, mr. chairman.

演讲稿的格式范文篇2

从古至今，多少人对“读书”有着深刻的理解。但是，今时不同往日，古时候与当代的人对“读书”都有着不同的理解。而古时候的概念和理论也被后人所广为传诵。

“惜‘三上’珍‘三余’只为五车八斗，读‘四书’研‘四史’可拥千户万钟”这便是古人对“读书”的看法。据我了解，这句话的意思大概是：“惜‘三上’珍‘三余’只为五车八斗”是古人对读书治学之道的总结，使自己变得才华出众。而“读‘四书’研‘四史’可拥千户万钟”应该是多读读和研究四书、四史等(古代应该是为了考举)，便能得到优厚的俸禄。从上句诗看来，诗句简练短小精悍应该就是古人写法的特色吧!

古今不同，古时虽如此，但我也要对"读书"的看法。

高尔基说过：“书籍是人类进步的阶梯。”的确!若不好好学习，便不能成大器。《礼记》里也曾有写：“玉不琢，不成器：人不学，不成材。”我爱读书，因为读书能使我增长知识;我爱读书，因为读书能使我开阔视野;我爱读书，因为读书能使我尽早跟上社会的脚步。读书，其实也是一件很辛苦的事。但若不好好读，就会在关键时不知所措，那时，便真是“书到用时方恨少，事非经过不知难”啊!回忆起往事，还曾记得有一次，放假了，老师要求我们看《三国演义》我便去书店买来看，看了几天，就觉得这本书十分无聊，大多数讲的都是打仗，烦!“反正老师也不知道，看不看都一样嘛。”我心想。就这样，我没看几回便不看了。等到开学了，老师突发奇想，说要考《三国演义》里的知识。“啊?!不会吧!没搞错吧?!”我一听，吓了一跳。结果就不用提了，唉!自此以后，我就“苦读”《三国演义》，仔细记下所有重点。光阴似箭，日月如梭。虽已事隔多年，但我如今仍在细读了《三国演义》。著名诗人苏轼说得好：“旧书不厌百回读，熟读精思子自知。”

读书，我们应该学习苏轼“发奋识遍天下字，立志读尽人间书”;读书，我们应该学习诸葛亮“非淡泊无以明志，非宁静无以致远”;读书，我们应该学习周恩来“为中华之崛起而读书。”

“黑发不知勤学早，白首方悔读书迟。”从现在开始，好好读书吧!

演讲稿的格式范文篇3

亲爱的朋友们：

大家好!

想我应该要有梦想的勇气。虽然梦想不一定能实现，想我现在应该用不断更新的热情对待我将来。并不是劝在座各位去买一副望远镜。但它能激励我前进。大学的学习并不像我中学阶段。完全靠自主的学习生活。

怀着一份热情相聚到这里。同样也带着父母新的希望，每个人都经历了紧张的另人窒息的高考。带着朋友新的祝愿，也带着自己新的理想，来到新的地方。这新的学期里我以新的语言，新的行动，新的风貌，新的一切去适应新的环境，开始新的学习。展示新的生活以掌握新的知识，增加新的技能，取得新的成绩。然后以新的姿态、新的风采站在父母、朋友、社会面前。虽然说是这样，真正经历大学生活后才知道：这都并非易事。

生活的茫然、空虚、枯燥、乏味使刚刚开始的大学生活缺乏驱动力。所以我要尽快确立新的学习生活目标。高尔基说过：一个人追求的目标越高，当大把大把的时间摆在面前时。才能就发展越快，对社会就越有益。目标能激发人的积极性，能产生自觉行为的动力。人一旦没有生活目标，就会意志消沉，浑浑噩噩我正处于富裕理想，憧憬未来的青年中期。生活的挫折不可避免，但在某些情况下，失望和忧虑的磨练只会使生活变得快乐和振奋。

剧作家尼尔·西蒙曾说：一直在想，几年前。怎样才能确切表达出他一生的主题。结论是有一个词可以最恰当的描述，那就是激情”说激情是主宰和激励他一切才能得力量，如果没有激情，生命会显得苍白和凄凉。当然，搞艺术的

可以从不同角度，大家都应该有照相的兴趣吧!相片可以记录瞬间的美丽。但有一位建筑师却这样说到如果给我一台照相机。把世界上任何地方最优秀建筑师的最新房屋，拍成行将倒塌得样子。因为我可以在上面找出五六个或七八个瑕疵，然后把镜头对准他就可以使人们相信整个建筑已经摇摇欲坠了社会上......

演讲稿的格式范文篇4

ladies and gentlemen， boys and girls，

i am chinese。 i am proud of being a chinese with five thousand years of civilization behind。 i’ve learned about the four great inventions made by our forefathers。 i’ve learned about the great wall and the yangtze river。 i’ve learned about zhang heng and i’ve learned about zheng he。who says the yellow river civilization has vanished?i know that my ancestors have made miracles on this fertile land and we’re still making miracles。 who can ignore the fact that we have established ourselves as a great state in the world， that we have devised our own nuclear weapons， that we have successfully sent our satellites into space， and that our gnp ranks no。 7 in the world? we have experienced the plunders by other nations， and we have experienced the war。 yet， based on such ruins， there still stands our nation----china， unyielding and unconquerable!

i once came across an american tourist。 she said， “china has a history of five thousand years， but the us only has a history of 200 years。 five thousand years ago， china took the lead in the world， and now it is the us that is leading。” my heart was deeply touched by these words。 it is true that we’re still a developing nation， but it doesn’t mean that we can despise ourselves。 we have such a long-standing history， we have such abundant resources， we have such intelligent and diligent people， and we have enough to be proud of。 we have reasons to say proudly： we are sure to take the lead in the world in the future again， for our problems are big， but our ambition is even bigger， our challenges are great， but our will is even greater。

i am chinese。 i have inherited black hair and black eyes。 i have inherited the virtues of my ancestors。 i have also taken over responsibility。 i am sure， that wherever i go， whatever i do， i shall never forget that i am chinese!

演讲稿的格式范文篇5

亲爱的老师、同学们：

大家好！

我是小明，一位品学优良的好学生。

我是一个多才多艺的女孩。我会唱歌，跳舞，经常上大舞台演出。我的舞姿优美，歌声嘹亮、动听，精彩的演出常常夺得观众们的轰鸣般的掌声。我经常参加校内外的各种活动，得到了老师、同学、评委们的赞赏。

当然了，想当上班长可不是单单文艺这方面好就能选上的，多才多艺的我在学习这方面也不赖。每次考试，我总是名列前茅，就在前不久，我还参加了“金平区中小学生课外阅读知识竞赛”获得了二等奖呢！

我不仅文艺好，学习好，而且心理素质也不错。记得我读三年级的时候，学校组织的艺术节，我一共参加了六个节目。排练期间，我每天忙得不得了，落下了许多功课，但是，在那段期间，我顶着巨大的压力，还考出全级第一的好成绩。在生活中，我的素质也不低，谈吐大方，做事体面，是合法的小公民。

如果我当上班长，我会让大大小小的班干部团结起来，一起搞好班级，我会帮助老师，努力将同学的精神集中在学习上，为毕业考打下了良好的基础。如果我当上班长，我一定会领好头，让同学们向提出的“四好少年”，从身边的小事做起，成为一名真正的合法公民！

如果我当上班长，我一定会很好地尽自己的职责，请大家投上您宝贵的一票，相信我，没有错！

谢谢大家！